Skip to content

XRP's Status as a Non-Security Remains Unchanged Despite Legal Obstacle as Per Ripple's Claim

Ripple affirms XRP falls outside securities law, as the court denies both SEC and Ripple's petition to mitigate penalty and revoke injunction due to procedural issues.

Ripple's XRP designated as non-security in court decision as judge denies both parties' requests to...
Ripple's XRP designated as non-security in court decision as judge denies both parties' requests to decrease penalty and rescind injunction based on procedural arguments.

Ripple's XRP Court Drama: Unraveling the Latest Twist

In the rollercoaster ride that is the legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), this week brought some intrigue. The renowned legal eagle, Stuart Alderoty, stirred the crypto community with a clarification on a recent court decision in the unending war. Contrary to an initial misconception, the judge's denied motion hasn't altered the fact that XRP remains unfazed in its non-security status.

Insightful knowledge nugget:- The non-security status of XRP stands strong, unaffected by the recent court proceedings.

A shimmering light in the dark Twitterverse, Alderoty shed light following Judge Analisa Torres' denial of a joint request to modify a previous judgment. The motion, aiming to dissolve an injunction and lower Ripple's $125 million penalty, was dismissed as "procedurally improper."

Alderoty asserted, "Nothin' 'bout today's order changes Ripple's wins (i.e. XRP ain't no securities, etc)." This confirmation was crucial, as the judge's decision focused on technicalities, and did not revisit or reverse any seminal legal judgments about XRP.

Ripple and SEC Remain #TeamworkMakestheDreamWork

Despite the setback, Ripple and the SEC are still cutting deals like old pals, hoping to bring this case to a close. Both parties had concocted a deal on May 8, aiming to settle a part of the case by halving the penalty and lifting the injunction on institutional XRP sales. Alderoty offered a pacifying assurance, "We'll revisit this issue with the court, together."

The existing injunction, preventing Ripple from committing future securities violations, is still up and running. Meanwhile, the original $125 million penalty looms over the company.

The good news? Ripple's legal powerhouse maintained that the core outcome from the 2023 ruling-that XRP is not a security during trades on public exchanges-is secure and impenetrable.

The case continues, but both sides appear to be on friendly speaking terms, poised to take the next steps as a cohesive unit. A properly filed motion might bring the same request back to the court when timing is just right.

Is the Classification of XRP a Continuous Controversy?

The SEC took aim at Ripple in December 2020, alleging that the company raised $1.3 billion through unregistered XRP sales, violating securities laws. A significant ruling in July 2023 declared that XRP sales to institutional investors were free of securities violations. However, the sale to retail investors on public exchanges still requires scrutiny.

The proposed settlement, rejected by Judge Torres, aimed to reduce Ripple's penalty and dissolve the impediment on XRP sales to institutional investors. As the case continues to snake through the appellate courts, the classification of XRP remains in a state of question, with the legal battle flaring up whenever a new step is taken.

  1. In the ongoing debate over the classification of XRP, the latest development hints that its non-security status might remain unchanged, despite the dismissed motion between Ripple and the SEC.
  2. As the legal battle between Ripple and the SEC persists, the integration of technology in the finance sector remains a key focus for both parties, with the classification of XRP remaining a contentious issue in the midst of their collaboration.

Read also:

    Latest