Ripple's Chief Technology Officer David Suggests Implementing a Fee Reimbursement System for the XRP Ledger
With a Gamble on Gaming the System, Ripple's CTO Proposes a Fairer Fee Model for the XRP Ledger
Diving into the Lucent realm of the XRP Ledger (XRPL), David Schwartz, Ripple's CTO, has put forth an audacious yet potentially groundbreaking notion: to rectify the disparity in fees, XRPL should refund the unused fees that users unnecessarily fork over, revolutionizing the way transactions are ordered, consensus is reached, and fairness is maintained.
Following the unraveling of how the Xahau Hook engine functions, developers within the XRP Ledger ecosystem clarified the system's modus operandi. When a hook is created, the system computes a fixed execution fee upfront, a cost that remains constant throughout, regardless of actual computation expenditure. While this method ensures predictable expenses, it also leads to users frequently shelling out for unnecessary compute costs they don't utilize.
Developer Mayukha Vadari elucidated the divergence from Ethereum’s model, where users state the amount of gas they're willing to splurge. If their transaction ends up consuming less gas, the excess is refunded. In contrast, XRPL's Hook system doesn't refund excess computation credits, as the network bases its calculation on the worst-case compute costs, leading to an excess payment in most instances.
Curious about why XRPL doesn’t consider this overpayment, Vet, co-founder of NFT platform XRP Cafe, mulled over the potential for refunds on the excess hook fees.
In response, Vadari argued that the hook fee isn't considered overpaid; it's a fixed cost by design. Shifting this paradigm could significantly alter the network's functioning. But Vet wasn't swayed. He postulated that if a user pays more than the actual network or load fee, the excess should be refunded to them.
When the expert protocol developer tecqu entered the fold, he raised a practical question: if users presumed they would get refunds, wouldn’t they attempt to overbid, leading to overloading the system and distorting the fee market?
That was when Ripple CTO David Schwartz skated into the discussion and floated a novel idea. Schwartz suggested a model in which everyone pays a fee upfront, but only the minimum required to secure a spot on the ledger retains its place. The excess would be refunded.
Schwartz conceded that this concept, while promising, could introduce complications. In the XRPL's present architecture, not all validators might agree on what the minimum required fee truly is. And if they disagree, it could lead to a schism in the ledger's history, a risk that must be averted at all costs.
"You might need to tinker with this idea to make it not fracture consensus," he admitted, "but it shouldn't be too challenging." He also flirted with an alternative strategy: refund any fees above the median fee level in a ledger. This method would bypass validator disagreements, providing a more consistent baseline.
To navigate any irregularities during periods of low network load, Schwartz proposed a simple rule: if there are less than ten transactions in a ledger, the refund mechanism could be deactivated or replaced with a minimum fixed fee.
Why It Matters
Currently, XRPL incinerates all transaction fees, even the undue portion that wasn't consumed. This technique serves to decrease the overall XRP circulation, but it also means users are forced to shell out more than required, especially when Hooks are in play.
David Schwartz isn't set on axing fee burning outright. Instead, he's probing a brainier way to manage it, one that allows users to reclaim their extra, unspent part of the fee. This will create a fairer model that keeps the system humming along appropriately.
The core crux of this debate lies in the undeniable impact that fee design has on systems.
Ethereum enables users to greatly estimate their gas requirements and refunds the unused gas if their transaction consumes less. XRPL, however, locks in a fixed fee. Now, Schwartz's idea of partial refunds adds another option to this equation, one that attempts to balance fairness, user-friendliness, and network stability.
At this juncture, the proposal is merely an idea. Yet, it's one that garners attention and could determine the future of fees on XRPL. Coming from Ripple's CTO and gaining traction in public discourse, the proposition may evolve into something more than just a concept.
Also Read: Lawyer_Reveals_Strongest_Argument_in_Ripple-SEC_Joint_Motion
In light of David Schwartz's proposal for a fairer fee model, one could consider integrating NFT technology to enable the refunding of excess fees, as Ethereum does with its gas model. This integration could potentially make transactions on the XRP Ledger more equitable, harmonizing the system with the latest technological advancements.
Given the discussion around the proposed fee refund model, it might be interesting to explore its implementation in other technologies, such as Ripple, Ethereum, and even NFT platforms, to enhance their fee structure and overall user experience.
