Skip to content

Individuals or groups within organizations potentially posing a threat to the unauthorized transfer of sensitive national security tech

In the expansion of our nation's innovation network, it's the smaller entities, such as businesses and colleges, that face the greatest vulnerability, rather than large corporations.

Individuals most susceptible to internally-executed theft of national security technology
Individuals most susceptible to internally-executed theft of national security technology

Individuals or groups within organizations potentially posing a threat to the unauthorized transfer of sensitive national security tech

The Federal Drive, a platform that provides expert insights on federal community events, recently hosted a discussion on the growing challenges and trends in protecting small businesses and universities from corporate espionage within a distributed national innovation network. The show was hosted by an unspecified individual and featured guest Michael Crouse, the Chair of INSA's insider threat subcommittee.

The discussion highlighted several key aspects of the current landscape:

  1. Increasing Interconnectivity and Collaboration: The innovation ecosystem is becoming more distributed, with universities, small businesses, and larger corporations collaborating extensively across dispersed geographic networks. These collaborations are often facilitated by digital platforms and shared research initiatives, increasing exposure to espionage risks.
  2. Use of Advanced Technology: Adoption of cloud computing, IoT devices, and sophisticated communication tools enhances innovation but also broadens the attack surface for espionage. Emerging technologies like AI are used both defensively and offensively in corporate espionage.
  3. Growing Cyber Threats: Cyberattacks targeting intellectual property and sensitive research data have become more frequent and sophisticated. Threat actors include foreign governments, corporate competitors, and insider threats within small firms and universities.
  4. Policy and Legal Environment Evolution: Governments are increasingly recognizing the risks and creating regulations and frameworks to protect innovation assets. There is a push for better standards and compliance measures tailored to small entities and academic institutions.

Challenges

  1. Resource Limitations: Small businesses and universities often lack the cybersecurity budgets, expertise, and infrastructure available to larger corporations, making them more vulnerable to espionage despite being critical innovation contributors.
  2. Balancing Openness and Security: Innovation networks thrive on openness and knowledge sharing, but this openness conflicts with the need to protect sensitive information. Finding the right balance to foster collaboration without compromising security remains difficult.
  3. Insider Threats and Human Factors: Faculty, students, and employees may inadvertently or intentionally leak sensitive IP due to lack of awareness or malicious intent. Developing effective training and monitoring without stifling academic freedom is challenging.
  4. Diverse and Dispersed Stakeholders: Protecting a distributed network with varied players (small firms, universities, federal agencies) requires coordinated strategies. Ensuring consistent security policies and trust across such a diverse ecosystem is complex.
  5. Rapidly Evolving Threat Landscape: The dynamic nature of espionage tactics demands continuous adaptation and updated defenses. Small entities often struggle to keep pace with the sophistication of attacks.

The guest, John Doyon, is the Executive Vice President of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance. The title discussion was about the Intelligence and National Security Alliance. The Federal Drive's website, owned by a platform with copyright rights reserved for the year 2025, can be accessed at FederalDrive@our website. Reader feedback and story ideas can be sent to this address. The Federal Drive offers interviews to keep up with daily news and analysis affecting the federal workforce.

  1. The Federal Drive, in a recent discussion, emphasized the importance of addressing cybersecurity concerns in the federal workforce, particularly focusing on small businesses and universities, as they struggle to finance adequate defenses against emerging threats, such as advanced technology and increasing interconnectivity, in the realm of corporate espionage within a distributed national innovation network.
  2. Given the challenges faced by small businesses and universities in balancing openness and security, particularly in the context of a small-business-focused, technology-driven business environment, it is crucial for these entities to cooperate with the federal workforce and finance dedicated resources for enhanced cybersecurity protections to safeguard intellectual property and sensitive research data.

Read also:

    Latest