Skip to content

European Court of Justice Advocates Clarity in Consumer Advertising Information

Consumers need to be provided with clear details about advertisements offering payment on account, according to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling.

Iconic Image of Justice Deity, Goddess Justitia
Iconic Image of Justice Deity, Goddess Justitia

The European Court's Take on "Buy Now, Pay Later": Making Advertising Clear as a Pell Mell Wind

Consumers Need Clear Details About 'Buy on Account' Advertisements: ECJ Demands Clarity - European Court of Justice Advocates Clarity in Consumer Advertising Information

Yo! It's Christmas shopping season, and Bonprix comes out swinging with a “Buy Now, Pay Later” offer in December 2021. The Consumer Center, however, called foul, claiming it was misleading. Seems folks didn't realize this pay-later proposition hinged on a creditworthiness checks first thing. They took the fight to court, aiming to stop Bonprix from touting this bait, but strikeout was the name of the game.

The case eventually landed at the doorstep of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) in Karlsruhe. See, the BGH thought that if Bonprix's claim was indeed a sales promotion offer, they should've spilled the beans about the creditworthiness nitty-gritty. But, alas, the BGH asked the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to clarify the term "sales promotion offer" under EU law. Could Bonprix's statement fit the bill? If so, it might've needed that creditworthiness disclaimer.

The ECJ didn't jump into the fray, squashing Bonprix's advertising yet. That's the BGH's job, but they'll need to factor in the ECJ’s legal opinion before making their call. The EU loves itself some transparency, so sales promotion offers, such as price cuts, freebies, and gifts, need to be as clear as a crystal-clear day. The fine print must be readily available and clearly sketched out.

So, what's the ECJ's verdict on "Buy Now, Pay Later" statements like Bonprix’s? In a nutshell, if it gives customers the green light to pay after the fact, grinning like Cheshire Cat, it counts as a sales promotion offer. Whether it's a financial or time-saving advantage is beside the point, mate. The ECJ explains that buying now, but paying later gives suckers more time, and that's as small, sweet little financial incentive as you can find. Besides, if you change your mind and back out, you don't have to apply for a refund. Game. Set. Match.

Now, whether or not this ruling applies to Bonprix’s specific case is still up in the air. That's for the BGH to decide, and they ain't hinted at when they'll break the news from Karlsruhe.

A few bits to help you decipher this lark - ECJ, BGH, and Consumer Center being the European Court of Justice, Federal Court of Justice, and Consumer Center, respectively. Hang tight for the final word from the BGH - their decision on the Consumer Center’s appeal is pending.

As for the ECJ’s stance on "Buy Now, Pay Later" advertisements and whether or not this promotional tactic falls under the umbrella of sales promotion offers? Well, scram' as the ECJ hasn't explicitly said squat on the matter just yet. But with EU law being more opaque than a oft-clouded sky over Yorkshire, keep your eyes peeled for future developments.

  • ECJ
  • Federal Court of Justice
  • Consumer Center
  • Creditworthiness
  • Karlsruhe
  • EU
  • Luxembourg
  • Germany
  • Consumer Center Hamburg

Bonus reading (15% or less of the total content)

While the provided article doesn't explicitly mention it, given the nature of the case and the principles of EU consumer and advertising law, references to payment methods such as "Buy Now, Pay Later" could potentially be considered sales promotion offers. European regulatory bodies may scrutinize such statements to determine if they comply with transparency and fairness standards, as they might imply a financial incentive or special promotional conditions.

Consumers should stay on their toes, keeping an eye on the developments to ensure advertisers play by the rules. As the EU continues to fine-tune regulations regarding online advertising, it's essential for consumers to become more discerning in their online transactions. Stay informed, be vigilant, and hang loose!

  1. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is yet to determine if statements like Bonprix’s "Buy Now, Pay Later" offers qualify as sales promotion offers under EU law, which could impact the transparency requirements for such advertisements.
  2. As the EU emphasizes transparency in sales promotion offers, businesses advertising "Buy Now, Pay Later" deals may need to disclose any necessary details such as creditworthiness requirements promptly and clearly to consumers.

Read also:

    Latest