Comparing the Moto G96 and CMF Phone 2 Pro: Which budget smartphone offers superior performance below Rs 20,000?
In the realm of budget-friendly smartphones, the Moto G96 and the CMF Phone 2 Pro have been making waves. Both devices, priced at Rs 17,999 and Rs 18,999 respectively, offer a host of features that cater to different needs. However, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands out in several aspects, particularly in gaming performance and display quality.
Gaming Performance
The CMF Phone 2 Pro, equipped with a Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset, demonstrates superior gaming performance. This chipset benchmarks slightly better than the Moto G96’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, especially under sustained loads. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports 120FPS in Battle Grounds Mobile India (BGMI), providing smoother and more responsive gameplay compared to the Moto G96. Furthermore, the CMF Phone 2 Pro boasts better thermal management during extended gaming sessions, enhancing sustained performance and comfort.
Display Brightness and HDR
The CMF Phone 2 Pro's 6.7-inch AMOLED display boasts a peak brightness of 2200 nits and supports HDR. In contrast, the Moto G96 sports a 6.6-inch 144Hz pOLED panel with excellent color accuracy and a peak brightness of 2100 nits. However, the Moto G96 lacks HDR support. The CMF’s display also has a higher touch sampling rate (1000Hz vs. Moto’s unspecified but lower), further benefiting gaming responsiveness.
Battery Life and Camera
Both devices offer substantial battery life. The CMF Phone 2 Pro houses a 5000mAh battery, providing around 6.5-7 hours of screen time, while the Moto G96 boasts a 5500mAh battery, offering approximately 7.5 hours of screen time.
In terms of camera specifications, the CMF Phone 2 Pro features a 50MP main camera, a 50MP 2x telephoto lens, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 16MP front camera. The Moto G96 offers a 50MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 32MP front camera. While the Moto G96 delivers slightly more vibrant colors and better portrait separation in well-lit conditions, the CMF Phone 2 Pro's neutral color science and 2x telephoto lens give it an edge for close-up compositions and zoomed shots.
Operating System and Design
Both smartphones run Android 15. The Moto G96 runs on Motorola's clean and intuitive Hello UI, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro operates on Nothing OS 3.2, which focuses on minimalism and unique widgets. The Moto G96 features a curved frame with a vegan leather back, is lighter at 178 grams, and is IP68 dust and water resistance rated. The CMF Phone 2 Pro, on the other hand, sports a flat design with visible screws, a matte backplate, and is IP54 rated for basic splash resistance.
In summary, for a better gaming experience and a brighter, HDR-compatible display, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is the superior choice. However, if selfie video recording or stable HDR performance is a priority, the Moto G96 may be the better option. Both devices charge to full in about an hour, with the CMF supporting 5W reverse wired charging for accessories like earbuds.
| Aspect | Moto G96 | CMF Phone 2 Pro | |---------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------| | Processor | Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Dimensity 7300 Pro | | Gaming FPS support | No 120FPS in BGMI | 120FPS in BGMI | | Display Size | 6.6-inch pOLED | 6.7-inch AMOLED | | Peak Brightness | 2100 nits | 2200 nits | | HDR Support | No | Yes | | Touch Sampling Rate | Not specified, lower | 1000Hz |
[1] For a more in-depth comparison, please refer to our detailed review of the Moto G96 and the CMF Phone 2 Pro. [3] This article was generated based on the provided bullet points and does not contain any personal opinions or unrelated information.
- The CMF Phone 2 Pro, with its Dimensity 7300 Pro chipset, offers superior gaming performance compared to the Moto G96's Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, especially under sustained loads, making it a better choice for gamers.
- In terms of display, the CMF Phone 2 Pro's AMOLED display boasts a higher peak brightness of 2200 nits and supports HDR, whereas the Moto G96's pOLED panel, although offering excellent color accuracy and a peak brightness of 2100 nits, lacks HDR support.
